Your E-mail:
Get the latest news, tips and
free advice every month
Do you use any form of permanent identification on your horse?


Printer Friendly Bookmark and Share

Equine Slaughter Voted Down in South Dakota

Legislators Opt to Kill Senate Bill 170.

Senate Bill 170, which wouldve resulted in a new horse slaughter plant, was denied by a South Dakota legislative committee
After being bombarded with anti-slaughter messages from people across the country, a South Dakota legislative committee killed Senate Bill 170 on Jan. 29. If passed, the bill would have set the wheels in motion for construction of an equine slaughter facility in that state. Currently, there are no U.S. equine slaughter facilities.

Senate Bill 170, which would have provided a $1 million state loan to construct an equine slaughter plant in South Dakota, was voted down because legislators there were concerned about horse slaughter legislation currently pending in Congress. That legislation, the American Horse Slaughter Prevention Act (H.R. 503/S. 311), a federal bill that was reintroduced to the current Congress this year, would make it illegal to slaughter horses for human consumption and would also outlaw the domestic and international transport of horses to slaughter. H.R. 503/S. 311 has yet to be voted on.

Many people considered the South Dakota bill a waste of time because of the pending federal legislation on horse slaughter. Animal welfare organizations are hailing the legislative decision to kill the bill and point to the overwhelming anti-slaughter sentiment in this country. According to an Associated Press report, South Dakota legislators said they received thousands of e-mail messages and phone calls from people who opposed Senate Bill 170. However, Republican Senator Tom Hansen said he wasn’t swayed by the messages. "We love to hear from our constituents, but we don't especially take kindly from hearing from people who don't even understand the situation, who live in California, Pennsylvania, New York," Hansen said.

01-31-2008


 Give us your opinion on
Equine Slaughter Voted Down in South Dakota

Submit a Comment   Join Club
Earn 1,000 points! What's this?
Reader Comments
I am definitely opposed to equine slaughter; especially as an effort to "help the economy." These "unwanted" horses were bred by humans and need to be taken care of by humans. There are a lot of unwanted dogs, too, but we don't have dog slaughter plants.
Meredith, Reno, NV
Posted: 5/23/2010 9:46:17 AM
I think the horse slaughter plant should be built we as responsible breeders have horses that are not worth anything. What is going to happen to all these unwanted horses are they going to be starved to death? These horses are unwanted for a reason they could have mental issues from being mistreated, and most of the time these horses are dangerous to be around. We need to stop breeding grade horses, and just because someone has a mare they breed her, and then do not spend any time with the foal so the foal than becomes untouchable, and thus unwanted. Horse kill plants are a nessacery evil, I do not like to horses killed for food any more than the next horse lover,but we have to cut down on the number of unwanted horses.
Barb, Marathon, WI
Posted: 2/3/2008 7:49:10 AM
thats to bad, poor horse will have to go to mexico now :(
cc, stevensville, MT
Posted: 1/31/2008 7:08:52 PM
Horses are shipped to Mexico & Canada everyday whether people like it or not. With our slumping economy and the serious decline in the horse business it seems inevitable there will be a plant of this nature somewhere in the United States eventually. Too bad it got shot down.
Kelly, New Germany, MN
Posted: 1/31/2008 10:03:26 AM
View Current Comments

Name:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
Email:
Young Rider
Buy Now
Horses USA
Buy Now
Horse Illustrated
Buy Now


Hi my name's Crown

Visit the Photo Gallery to
cast your vote!
Information on over 200 dog breeds